Deliberative democracy supports an inclusive, informed, and reasoned approach to participatory government. It promotes discussions that helps citizens make informed decisions by creating spaces for people to share their opinions and explore possible solutions. However, diversity is essential for deliberative democracy to be worthwhile.
This CEPS In-depth Analysis aims to engage two primary audiences. First, it offers academics and policymakers a comprehensive overview of the literature on involving marginalised populations in deliberative democracy. This overview not only examines the theoretical foundation of how marginalisation undermines the prospects of deliberative democracy but also explores the factors contributing to such exclusion. Second, the Analysis provides practical guidance for practitioners in deliberative democracy and event organisers who incorporate elements of democratic dialogue. After all, this In-depth Analysis bridges the gap between theory and practice, contributing to the continued progress of deliberative democracy.
About the authors:
Marta Dell’Aquila is a Researcher in the Global Governance, Regulation, Innovation and Digital Economy (GRID) Unit at CEPS.
Olesya Grabova is a Research Assistant in the GRID Unit at CEPS.
Réka Heszterényi is an Intern in the GRID Unit at CEPS.
Berta Miszei is a Researcher in the GRID Unit at CEPS.
Timothy Yu-Cheong Yeung is a Research Fellow at CEPS. He is also an Associate Researcher at the Leuven Center for Empirical Jurisprudence of KU Leuven in Belgium.